>Ephisto Premium<

Take the next step. Ephisto premium english for only 59 euro per year.
You get:
  • Exclusive dictionaries
  • Breaking news
  • Measurement tools
  • Language games
  • Video discussions

  • Upgrade to Ephisto Premium

    Últimos en línea

    norainnorain
    Palestinian Territory, Occupied
    Swedish
    lollanlollan
    Sweden
    English
    buccexpescicebuccexpescice
    Afghanistan
    English
    ManickossDaronnManickossDaronn
    Afghanistan
    English
    radiopodarokradiopodarok
    Afghanistan
    English
    paulinpaulin
    Sweden
    Swedish
    largo16largo16
    United Kingdom
    English, Spanish
    Miembros online: 0
    Visitantes en línea: 26

    Nuestros socios

    Oxford

    TT

    Natur och Kultur

    AFP

    Bush veto of child health bill sustained

    Last Updated: 2007-10-22 14:32

    Democrats unable to save popular, bipartisan bill

    WASHINGTON. House Democrats were unable yesterday to override President Bush’s veto of their preelection year effort to expand a popular government health insurance program to cover 10 million children.

    The bill had bipartisan support, but the 273-156 roll call was 13 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed to enact the bill into law over Bush’s objections. The bill had passed the Senate with a veto-proof margin.

    The State Children’s Health Insurance Program now subsidizes health care coverage for about 6 million children at a cost of about $5 billion a year. The vetoed bill would have added 4 million more children, most of them from low-income families, to the program at an added cost of $7 billion annually.

    To pay for the increase, the bill would have raised the federal tax on cigarettes from 39 cents to $1.00 a pack.

    “This is not about an issue. It’s about a value,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said just before the vote. “For the cost of less than 40 days in Iraq, we can provide SCHIP coverage for 10 million children for one year.”

    “We won this round on SCHIP,” White House press secretary Dana Perino said after the vote.
    Republican opponents said the bill would encourage too many middle-income families to
    substitute government-subsidized insurance for their private insurance.

    Proponents emphasized that the program would focus on families with annual incomes that are
    below $41,300 for a family of four.

    >Created by< admin

    Tiempo a leer: 3.6 Mi